The 1990s brought us several great movies. It may have been the last decade before all the overdone reboots and sequels began reusing every creative idea ever thought of. And now we know what North Dakota's favorite 90s movie was.
Christmas is almost upon us and nothing puts you in the holiday spirit more than a festive Christmas movie and now we know what the most popular one is in North Dakota.
If you're staying in on this Halloween night and need a festive movie to watch, the most popular choice of a horror flick in North Dakota could be to your liking.
In case you haven't heard by now, North Dakota plays a key role in the new movie "Logan," which opened this weekend. Here's what was right and wrong with the geography throughout the movie.
Next week, there's a good chance your significant other is either going to attempt to drag you to the new "Fifty Shades Darker" movie, but that doesn't mean you can't suggest something a little...not so...bad.
Noted Comic-Con hater, actor and apparently now writer, Jesse Eisenberg, appeared on NBC’s Today to promote his upcoming book of short stories “Bream Gives Me Hiccups” and talk eventually turned to Batman vs. Superman. It was at this point that Eisenberg, who plays Lex Luthor in the upcoming superhero movie, assured us all that not only is Batman vs. Superman a “phenomenal” movie, but that’s it’s also a “very serious” movie. To which, the entire universe responded with a resounding, no freaking duh.
Everything that goes wrong in Poltergeist stems from an act of desecration; the building of a cookie-cutter housing development on top of an old cemetery. Some might find the sheer act of attempting a remake of Poltergeist similarly disrespectful; the 1982 original is something of a masterpiece of suburban terror. But if viewers can look past the sheer audacity of attempting another Poltergeist, they’ll find a solid modernization, the cinematic equivalent of a decent cover version of a great rock song. It’s totally superfluous, and not nearly as satisfying as the original, but well-performed and effective in its own way. It’s nice (or, in this case, deeply unsettling) to revisit an old classic in a new arrangement.